The Iowa House has passed a bill that would prevent Summit Carbon from using eminent domain authority to seize land along its proposed pipeline route. Republican Representative Steven Holt of Denison says people who don’t want the pipeline on their property should have the right to say no. “It affects their business. It affects their lives,” Holt said, “and they were there first.” The bill is similar to a law in South Dakota and it passed the Iowa House on a 64-to-28 vote. Republican Representative Chad Ingels, a farmer from Randalia, says the bill would block construction of the carbon pipeline, a project he says would be a public good because it would boost the bottom line for farmers who sell their corn to make ethanol. “Having better markets for our products is not only in my family’s best interest, it’s my neighbor’s best interest, it’s in a farmer in southwest Iowa’s best interest,” Ingels said. “…It’s in the best interest of our state to have young people willing to come back and farm.”
This bill now goes to the Senate and is among a handful of pipeline-related proposals the House has passed over the past five years. House debate on Wednesday afternoon lasted only half an hour for a bill that was just two pages long. The Republican leader in the Iowa Senate has proposed an alternative that would widen the pipeline corridor so Summit could go around landowners who’ve refused to grant the company an easement on their property.
